The Pros & Cons of Business Innovation at IT Organizations


Geetha Swaminathan

Manager, Cognizant Technology Solution, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Peer Review Report

Received Date

03.06.2019

Accepted Date

27.06.2019

Published Date

01.07.2019

Plagiarism

Accepted Level

Reviewer’s Comments to Authors

Major Comments

  1. Very important part of any research study is objective. This paper is not framed with any objective it seems. There is no any objective of the study in any part of the paper. Without objective a research study will not be a complete one. So, the researcher has to add objectives of the study.
  2. There is no information on the research methodology used for the study. Researcher should concentrate on this part and give the methodology of selecting this particular topic
  3. There is no information on the review of related literatures. If this study is first hand study the researcher should produce valid proof or can include the reference details on the study.
  4. Many review reference names has been given inside of the paper where the missing of reference detail of such reviews in the reference part of the study for ex. no reference detail for Tushman and some more. It is important to add reference detail when some names given as reference for the current study.
  5. There is no information on data collection, period of study, techniques used for collecting the data, footnote and findings for the study. The author should focus on the above mentioned parts which are mainly needed for a research study.
  6. There was no mention of the limitations of the study, one of which is the apparently high dropout rate.
  7. It is important to add the area of study. Because the given title is a wide thing but it is needed to mention on which area the study has been taken.
  8. There is no information on whether the study is based on primary/secondary/both sources of data collections. It should be mentioned for future reference purpose.

Minor Comments

  1. Too many information has given randomly which is not particularly meet out the need for the study. The author should eliminate some data which is not needed for the study.
  2. For every reference there should be a footnote in the relevant pages for future reference.
  3. Researcher can be highlight the research gap and pave the way for future research.
  4. Conclusion given is not based on the findings/observations out of study. It should summarize the entire study and give valuable suggestions and proper conclusion.